Fed language is consistent with our base case for 50 bps rate hike, says BofA's Bhave - YouTube

Channel: CNBC Television

[0]
aditya welcome good to have you with us
[2]
uh you heard steve's recap of what the
[4]
feds said
[5]
they discussed at their most recent
[7]
meeting and in light of what they did
[9]
how do you interpret the language there
[12]
thanks for having me yeah i think the
[15]
language is consistent with our base
[17]
case for a 50 basis point rate hike one
[20]
thing to note is that the minutes are a
[22]
touch scale because after the minutes
[24]
we've gotten you know the very strong
[26]
jobs report
[28]
the very strong retail sales report this
[30]
morning and the softer than expected
[33]
july cpi inflation print so if the fed
[35]
looks at that you can say okay well
[38]
inflation slowed down just a touch not
[40]
just on the headline but also in terms
[42]
of the core and we are seeing uh the
[45]
housing and capex data suggests that the
[47]
interest rate sensitive parts of the
[48]
economy are being affected by fed
[51]
heights so if they really do want to be
[52]
data dependent going forward then i
[54]
think there is a pretty good case to
[56]
slow down just a little bit so so if
[58]
they're if they're true to their word
[59]
and going to be data dependent the data
[62]
steve says aditya
[64]
tells him at least that they may not do
[67]
another three-quarter point that they
[69]
might come back to a half point we just
[71]
heard from diana olek who who used the
[74]
word housing is in recession
[78]
the fed acknowledged that quite a bit
[80]
the housing being in recession uh the
[83]
house the fed did not say that sorry the
[84]
fed talked about the housing slowdown
[86]
right and also tyler they brought up
[88]
this idea which i thought was
[89]
interesting that because of the fed's
[91]
communications which as you know is
[93]
quite extensive um that uh the market
[96]
the economy may be responding more
[99]
rapidly to these rate increases than it
[101]
has in the past i just take a step back
[103]
from this tyler you know next week we're
[104]
going to be in jacksonville we'll be
[105]
talking to a lot of fed officials i'm
[107]
kind of realizing reading these minutes
[109]
i have my work cut out for me there are
[111]
some differences of opinion on this uh
[114]
committee that maybe i wasn't quite as
[115]
aware until i read these these notes
[117]
there is definitely a hawkish wing and a
[120]
dovish wing that has emerged and i think
[122]
that may have come out after the 75
[124]
basis point hike that now there's a real
[126]
maybe a more intense debate on the
[128]
federal reserve about where they go from
[129]
here with many saying that there's a
[131]
concern about tightening too much i'm
[133]
not sure how well that maybe may have
[134]
been appreciated and some are at this
[136]
maintain uh reach a higher level and and
[139]
stay there for a while there are some
[141]
differences out there we have to do some
[142]
more reporting on this and thankfully
[144]
we're going to get a big uh chunk of
[145]
that next week at jackson hole who would
[148]
you say has the balance of power and
[149]
what does the fed chair represent in
[151]
terms of those wings steve you know i
[153]
think i think the fed chair is more
[154]
likely to be a little bit more hawkish
[156]
here he wants to stamp out inflation and
[158]
not have it be part of his record as
[160]
being fed chair of a long and lasting
[162]
inflation and one that uh he's for
[164]
example moved to combat and then took
[167]
his eye off the ball have it come back
[170]
my best guess is that's the way powell
[172]
feels about it i will say this following
[174]
jim bullard has been an interesting
[176]
exercise where he says things that feel
[178]
like they're extreme then they end up
[180]
being the center of the committee in
[182]
other words people scoffed at the idea
[183]
of 75 basis points when he first said it
[185]
well guess what they've done it twice
[187]
now absolutely adio what would you add
[189]
to that where do you think the
[191]
kind of center of gravity is and where
[194]
do you think it's going
[195]
yeah i think the dubs the hawks sorry
[198]
still carry the day um i did say we
[201]
expect 50 in september but that doesn't
[203]
mean that we necessarily expect a lower
[205]
terminal rate if anything the risks from
[208]
a potential soft landing with better
[210]
consumer spending data are that the
[212]
terminal rate goes higher because the
[214]
chain of reasoning for me here is lower
[218]
inflation on the one hand means less
[220]
urgency to hike in the near term but on
[222]
the other hand it means that consumer
[224]
spending and the broader economy holds
[227]
up a little bit better which means
[229]
there's less conflict between the fed's
[231]
two mandates and so they can keep hiking
[233]
so the risks are that we could
[235]
potentially see a terminal rate of four
[237]
percent maybe even higher