Positive economic impact of UK immigration from the EU - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
What we do in this paper is to investigate the fiscal net contribution of immigrants.
[5]
We focus on immigrants who came after 2000 and we consider the period between 2000 and
[10]
2011.
[13]
So the main body of the paper is concerned with trying to understand whether they have
[19]
paid more
[21]
or less in terms of taxes than what they received in terms of benefits.
[26]
And what we find is that all immigrant groups who came to the UK since 2000 have made
[32]
positive fiscal contributions to the country over a period in which the country was running
[38]
overall a budget deficit so the average native was making a negative fiscal contribution,
[45]
and this is true for all groups of origin.
[49]
So we distinguished between different groups of immigrants: immigrants coming from
[53]
non-EA countries; immigrants coming from EEA 15 countries, so the old European countries
[59]
such as
[59]
Germany, France and Italy; and immigrants coming from the new accession countries –
[65]
Poland, Hungary,
[67]
Bulgaria, Czech Republic and others. Now for all three groups, we find that over the period
[73]
between 2000 and 2011, for those who arrived after 2000, the net fiscal contribution is
[79]
clearly
[80]
positive – that means they paid more in terms of taxes than what they received in
[85]
terms of
[85]
transfers and benefits.
[87]
By transfers we mean welfare provisions, tax credits, and we specifically look at that.
[98]
But we additionally, when we do our overall fiscal analysis, we not only look at direct transfers,
[105]
but we also look at the services that the individuals receive and that are paid for
[110]
by the state,
[111]
for instance road maintenance, fire services, street lighting and so on.
[118]
So we do account for all public expenditures in our analysis, and what it is important
[124]
to stress is that
[126]
some of these expenditures are fixed, regardless of the size of the population.
[130]
Take the army for instance – the UK needs an army that is the same size, regardless
[135]
of the number
[136]
of immigrants that are in the country at any point in time, so that's an expenditure
[140]
that the UK government would have to bare in any case, and the fact that you have
[148]
more people in the country means that you can spread that course over a larger pool
[154]
of people,
[154]
which in some sense means that immigrants are allowing savings on some fixed public
[161]
expenditures
[162]
to UK residents.
[164]
An interesting aspect of looking at what immigrants actually contribute is what
[171]
education do they bring with them and where do we find them in the labour market.
[176]
So usually immigrants come educated – somebody must have paid for that education,
[180]
and what we do in this paper is to assess the contribution immigrants make to the UK economy
[189]
by endowing the UK economy with skills and education, which has been paid for by
[197]
their country of origin, so for those immigrants who come between 2000 and 2011,
[203]
we find that over that 11-year period, they endowed the UK labour market with education,
[210]
which would have costed the UK tax payer if it was generated in the UK in the magnitude
[217]
between 6 and 7 billion pounds.
[220]
Especially recent immigrants, and particularly those from the new accession countries,
[226]
have very high employment rates, so they have very high participation in the
[231]
labour market compared to both UK natives and to other immigrant groups.
[238]
So, that is an indication that they come here primarily for working, and thus they do not
[245]
take much advantage of the welfare provisions that are available to them.
[250]
What we are looking at in this paper is the fiscal contribution of immigrants –
[254]
we are not looking at the labour market, we are not looking at their possible impact on wages,
[259]
we are not looking at their possible impact on innovation or economic growth –
[265]
these are other aspects which we don't touch upon in this particular study,
[271]
and we hope people do that in future research.