Donald Trump vs Joe Biden: Who’s Better for BITCOIN!? - YouTube

Hey yo, what’s the vote, with the Chico Army & if your new, and looking for a youtube

crew, subscribe, to drop the title of viewer of the tube.

My names Tyler, and this old guys monologue is the perfect beginning

to

the coming content.

You know our Vermin Supreme, it’s time for Chico Crypto!

Controversial to start the week?

Why not?..

Tomorrow is the day people are putting pen to paper, to vote on who should be running

America for the next 4 years.

The Trumpster or the Bidster….so today, we are going to decimate, dissect & understand

which of these three, are better for Bitcoin…

So, let’s begin the day off with our current president.

Tramp.

So, publicly, he has told us what he thinks about crypto.

He tweeted in July of 2019 “I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which

are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air.

Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drooga trade and other

illegal activity....We have only one real currency in the USA, and it is stronger than

ever, both dependable and reliable.

It is by far the most dominant currency anywhere in the World, and it will always stay that

way.

It is called the United States Dollar!”

He is not a fan, he thinks their values are based on thin air, used for droogas, unlawful

behavior and other illegal activity.

And he has a hard on for the dollar.

So when someone publicly states, they don’t like something, it’s because they mean it.

He isn’t playing 4d chess, he is an old fart that barely knows how to use a computer,

he hates bitcoin, and he will never understand it, because he doesn’t want to.

And What else has he said??

Well let’s just talk about his treasury secretary, snooch mynooch, steve mnoooch.

It was leaked this year, that Trump in 2018..was directing him to “go after bitcoin”.

This was in the summer of 2018 friends.

May to be exact…..Steve Mnuchin, as treasury secretary, was told to do something about

BTC.

So did he?

The nooch?

Well of course he did & it all makes sense now..you just have to look at the timelines.

So let's begin, just after 2008, the last financial crisis….

Steve has a best friend, who worked with him, at OneWest bank, where they earned the nicknames

foreclosure kings...for their cruelty in kicking out struggling families to repossess homes..but

also the elderly.

OneWest’s, financial freedom unit, which issued reverse mortgages, foreclosed on over

16000 homes, with elderly residents since 2009.

So who was his partner in home wrecking crime?

None other than our acting comptroller of the currency, in Steve’s pocket with the

treasury, Brian Brooks.

Now, remember, I said the timelines...well, Trump directed Steve to go after bitcoin,

in May of 2018.

What did Steve’s buddy do, Brian…. just 3 months later, in September of 2018...well

as we can see from his Linked’n...he joined Coinbase.

Take down BTC, words from Trump’s mouth May of 2018, by September of 2018, Steve’s

partner in crime joins Coinbase?

Brian is only at Coinbase, for just over a year, before rejoining his buddy Steve, now

as a top financial regulator?

Something stinks, and it stinks BAD!

I mean, why would Brian do this?

Financial disclosures show that Brian, had to sell 4.6 million is Coinbase stock options,

and take a massive salary cut, to join the comptroller, a salary cut of 1.4 million per

year, to under 300k as the acting comptroller of the currency.

That’s a massive pay cut, that’s a massive chunk of stock options you're going to miss

out on...like million upon millions, and maybe even more over the next couple of years...if

you didn’t know, Coinbase in July announced they were planning an IPO, So...Brian, just

threw away stock options, for probably the biggest IPO of the century...does that make

sense?

And here’s exactly why I believe Brian, is not a friend, and is actually a foe...He

is a trojan horse, made to look like a friend, but deep down, his MO is to take it all down.

So, July of 2019, Brian Brooks, is on the team of Coinbase….

Trump put’s out his infamous, I hate bitcoin tweet….Brian Armstron of Coinbase, retweets

it saying “Achievement unlocked!

I dreamt about a sitting U.S. president needing to respond to growing cryptocurrency usage

years ago.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”.

We just made it to step 3 y'all”

So, we are at the “fight you” stage with Trump in July of 2019?

Oh ya your soooo fighting for Bitcoin, when you have Trump’s future comptroller of the

currency, on the coinbase team who is best of friends with his Treasury Secretary.

I’m still trying to figure all of this out, but either Coinbase, got trojan horsed...or

Coinbase, bowed down to the powers that be, and are in on the destruction of bitcoin now.

And I’m leaning towards the latter, as Brian Brooks, before September of 2018, had not

a lick of involvement in the crypto space, there is nothing about him talking about it

& Coinbase knew who Brian was when they hired him, they specifically mention his involvement

with Onewest, thus they knew his ties to Steve Mnuchin, and that administration.

So, a recap, Trump hates Bitcoin, he’s public about it, and he has directed people who work

with him to “go after it”...So now it’s time to switch gears to Biden.

Now he has been much more silent about BTC...the only thing Joe has publicly stated, was after

the twitter account hacks this summer, he tweeted “I don’t have Bitcoin, and I’ll

never ask you to send me any.

But if you want to chip in to help make Donald Trump a one-term President, you can do that

here.

That's about it, from Joe, from what I could find regarding his public words on BTC.

But his running mate, Kamala has a bit more..nothing publicly stated, but according to Decrypt,

her VP team does have pro-crypto people on it, including Ryan Montoya, former CTO of

the sacramento kings, who got them gungho on Bitcoin and crypto, even mining in the

kings arena.

Although, we gotta talk about Joe’s capital gain tax policies, especially if we are going

to talk about crypto.

According to Biden’s tax plan, capital gains will be raised in certain income brackets.

Now, with his plan anyone making over 400k per year, is going to have their taxes adjusted

Under 400k, taxes will be the same.

So what percentage of Americans are getting their taxes raised??

Well let’s just go to the household percentile income percentile calculator, and put in 400k...oh,

you are in the top 2 percentile, only 2 percent of Americans...98 percent of others have less

of an income…

But, crypto isn’t wage income, it’s investment income...and again investment income for those

making under 400k will stay the same, for those who make between 0 to 40k in investment,

capital gains tax is 0 percent, 40k to 441k is taxed at 15 percent, and above that 441k,

it’s currently taxed at 20 percent.

This would all stay the same under Biden, only those making over 1 million per year,

would have their capital gains raised...it would be raised to 37 percent per year for

them.

So, for over 99 percent of crypto traders, who don’t trade over 1 million per year

& over 98 percent of americans, those who don’t make over 400k per year...

things will be the same regarding taxes.

And from all this, you would think I would be coming to the conclusion, that Biden is

Better for Bitcoin...Butttt, Taxes, regulations, the control over crypto…..It's the MO of

both administrations.

If you’re truly for crypto, your for Satoshi, your for the freedom of money, you wouldn’t

vote for either of these Turds.

Because there is a better option.

Who is more crypto friendly, than either of them, and guess what?

This is America, where you get to vote for whoever you please, the candidate fits your

views, and if anyone tells you voting third party is throwing away a vote, their just

brainwashed funks, who think they have a voice, but really are just a 2 party system controlled

robot idiot.

So who is this better candidate Tyler?

It’s Jo Jorgenson, the Libertarian candidate...and why is she running for prez?

From her own mouth “Because the government is too big, too nosy, too intrusive, and it

often hurts those it tries to help”

And she isn’t afraid to speak on Bitcoin, and her administration's pro-crypto views.

In an interview with bitcoin.com in June of this year, they asked “Can you tell our

readers what types of plans you have that would address specifically bitcoin and cryptocurrency

advocates?

Jo replied “First I would enact Ron Paul’s Free Competition in Currency Act.

This would repeal legal tender laws and taxes on coins and monetary metals.

And it would repeal the prohibition on coining money.

Also, I would repeal the Bank Secrecy Act, Know-Your-Customer (KYC), and other laws that

violate our right to financial privacy.

Many people go to bitcoin because they do want privacy so I would work to repeal those

unjust laws.

I would also appoint commissioners to the CFTC and the SEC who would then seek to deregulate

Bitcoin and other crypto-assets.

I would appoint leaders at the Treasury Department, who would be told to leave bitcoin and crypto

operations alone.

Lastly, I would pardon Ross Ulbricht, the individual who operated the Silk Road (SR)

marketplace”

Soooo, if your pro bitcoin, pro crypto, pro decentralization, there is only 1 candidate

who should fit your bill.

The only one who has publicly stated what they would do, that is pro-crypto….

The other two, for the Democraps & Rebublicants...they are actually 1...both parties are for bigger

government, just in their own funked up forms, they enjoy the power, and the more centralized

it gets, the better for them.

Decentralize the US government why don’t we?

By adding a third, I mean a second party…..and guess what?

The only people who can do it, are the people.

You just gotta break out of being hypnotized….

Sooo, I know, my voice is only so much, but if I changed a few people’s opinions its

worth it.

I know Jo isn't going to win..but things have to start somewhere, let me try and explain….it’s

going to be a tough, rough...upwards climb.

2016 election, Libertarian Candidate Gary Johnson, knew he had a slim chance of winning,

but for some reason, wanted 5 percent of the vote?

Why?

It would entitle his party to fair funding, and equal treatment, 10 million dollars to

be exact.

Did the libertarians get it?

No, Gary got just over 3.2 percent of the popular vote...although, compared with results

in 2012, he only got 1 percent.

So, Jo, is once again shooting for that 5 percent number and if they keep up the percentage

gain in votes compared with 2012 and 2016, Jo should cross that 5 percent mark and secure

federal funding for their party, potentially helping them secure a spot on the presidential

debate stage, they would have the funds, like the others to get the libertarian 2024 candidate

polling above 15 percent, in that national polls, the requirements to be on the national

debate stage.

It can happen, your third party vote is not a waste.

Cheers I’ll see you next time!