How Big a Role Do Private Equity Firms Play in U.S. Economy? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
bjbjLULU JUDY WOODRUFF: Finally tonight, we return to an issue raised by the focus on
[3]
Mitt Romney's taxes, how he made his money as the head of a so-called private equity
[9]
firm.
[10]
Those firms invest in other companies, often troubled ones, and try to turn them around.
[15]
But there is great debate over whether private equity activity is more focused on short-term
[20]
profits or the long-term health of the company.
[23]
We have our own debate about that with Stewart Kohl.
[26]
He's co-CEO of The Riverside Company, a private equity firm that manages more than $3 billion
[33]
in assets.
[34]
And Josh Kosman, the author of the book "The Buyout of America: How Private Equity is Destroying
[41]
Jobs and Killing the American Economy.
[44]
We thank you both for being with us.
[46]
Josh Kosman, just so that we understand what we're talking about here, how big a role does
[50]
private equity play in the U.S. economy?
[52]
JOSH KOSMAN, author, "The Buyout of America: How Private Equity Will Cause the Next Great
[54]
Credit Crisis": Private equity firms own companies employing about one out of every 10 Americans.
[58]
So they are hugely important.
[61]
They're America's biggest employers.
[63]
And up until recently, they ve been largely ignored.
[65]
And, Judy, there's just one thing that I needed to jump in and say.
[69]
I think it's a fallacy -- and it's what the Mitt Romney defenders are trying to throw
[73]
up in the air -- that private equity firms buy troubled companies.
[76]
They're almost always buying profitable businesses, not troubled businesses.
[80]
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, that will be part of the question that I ask Stewart Kohl now,
[84]
because let's -- let's get -- have a basic understanding of what private equity is about.
[90]
It's a group of outside investors who put their money together, borrow a lot of money,
[95]
buy a company, then try to make that company profitable, sell it, so that they then can
[101]
make a profit.
[102]
Is that fair, Stewart Kohl?
[103]
STEWART KOHL, The Riverside Company: It is, Judy.
[106]
We collect money from pension funds and endowments for colleges and foundations and the like.
[112]
And firms like The Riverside Company invest that into, as Josh says, mostly healthy companies,
[120]
with the objective of making those companies a bigger and better over an extended period
[125]
of time, so that companies become more valuable, so that they can be sold then eventually for
[130]
a higher price, which allows us to generate attractive returns for those colleges, universities,
[138]
foundations, and the like.
[139]
JUDY WOODRUFF: But you agree it's mostly healthy companies that are invested in?
[143]
STEWART KOHL: Yes.
[145]
There's a subset, a segment of private equity they focuses on troubled companies, companies
[150]
that are struggling.
[152]
I have a lot of respect for those firms.
[154]
That's hard work, and it is not something that The Riverside Company does.
[158]
But it is a small, but important part of private equity.
[161]
JUDY WOODRUFF: So, Josh Kosman, you have a problem.
[163]
You're critical of the way most, if not all private equity operates.
[167]
Why?
[168]
JOSH KOSMAN: Well, most.
[170]
And I have a lot of respect for Stewart's firm, which mostly buys companies not with
[175]
a tremendous amount of leverage.
[176]
And, really, the only way Stewart's firm makes money is by growing the businesses, because
[181]
they traditionally have brought relatively small businesses.
[184]
But the way mainstream private equity works, which includes Bain Capital, is they buy companies
[189]
by putting them in deep debt.
[191]
And then the record shows -- I did two years of full-time investigative work on my book
[195]
-- that they don't improve the businesses -- 52 percent of the companies acquired in
[200]
the 25 biggest buyouts of the '90s ended up going bankrupt.
[204]
I looked at the 10 biggest buyouts of the 1990s.
[207]
So I wasn't cherry-picking.
[209]
In six of the 10 cases, it's clear that the company would have been better off if they
[213]
had never been acquired.
[215]
In three cases, it was mixed.
[216]
In one case, the P.E.
[218]
firm did improve the business.
[219]
In this decade, Moody's came out with a report just last month that showed that, in the 40
[225]
biggest leveraged buyouts that all occurred in kind of '05, '06, '07, '08, that those
[230]
companies were -- had grown revenue since being acquired by 4 percent, while their strategic
[235]
peers, their peers, had grown revenue 14 percent.
[238]
So, to me, there's.
[239]
. . JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, let me.
[240]
. . JOSH KOSMAN: Go ahead.
[241]
JUDY WOODRUFF: I was just going to say, let me break in now, if I may, and ask Stewart
[245]
Kohl, if -- given that picture that we just heard painted, it sounds like these private
[253]
equity firms are destroying more than they're building up.
[256]
STEWART KOHL: I disagree.
[259]
And here's why.
[261]
Private equity relies on its ability to attract capital, again, from these pension funds and
[266]
others.
[268]
And to attract that capital, it needs to generate good returns.
[271]
To generate good returns, it needs to invest in companies that grow and prosper.
[276]
And that is overwhelmingly what private equity has achieved over the several decades that
[282]
it's been around.
[284]
We went through a very difficult period after 2007, the global financial crisis, the resulting
[290]
recession, the worst since the Great Depression.
[293]
And, surely, some private equity-done transactions struggled.
[298]
Surely, some public companies and privately held companies struggled as well.
[302]
But, overall, private equity wouldn't be continuing to attract the capital that it attracts if
[308]
it wasn't able to generate consistently good returns, which it does really in one way,
[314]
which is by making the companies that its invests in bigger and better.
[317]
JUDY WOODRUFF: So, Josh Kosman, if that's the case -- and that doesn't sound like it
[321]
squares with what you were saying -- how do you square that, and what all does this mean
[326]
for jobs?
[327]
JOSH KOSMAN: I think that, you know, for Bain, 22 percent of the money they invested in funds
[333]
raised from '87 to '95, during the time Mitt was there, were in companies which they made,
[339]
Bain and their investors made $578 million, the bulk of their profits, and all those companies
[345]
ended up going bankrupt.
[347]
Unfortunately, when you buy a sizable company and load it up with debt, and then take money
[353]
out, have the company, after you raise earnings in the short term through cuts, borrow money
[357]
and pay yourself dividends in the short term and set up those companies for failure, they
[363]
can fail and you can still make a lot of money.
[365]
JUDY WOODRUFF: Stewart Kohl.
[367]
. . Yeah, let me bring in Stewart Kohl on that point, about the short-term turnaround,
[373]
the pressure on these companies to make a profit, and the investors get out.
[378]
STEWART KOHL: The investment that private equity firms make in is, of course, equity.
[384]
It is the last claim on the cash flow and earnings and value of the company.
[390]
In order for that equity to be valuable, the company needs to succeed, it needs to be able
[395]
to service and, over time, retire its debt.
[399]
The amount of debt a company borrows is a function of the profitability of the company
[405]
and the -- where we are in the cycle and the willingness of banks to lend.
[410]
Surely, there are periods when banks will lend higher amounts and lower amounts.
[415]
And there's sometimes situations, such as we saw in 2008-2009, when companies that had
[424]
performed splendidly in 2005, 2006 and 2007 struggled and the amounts that they borrowed
[429]
in this periods then looked high.
[431]
Those companies worked hard to become successful again.
[434]
The private equity businesses that invested in them worked equally hard to make those
[441]
companies successful, because, if they weren't able to do that, they would not be able to
[446]
raise their next fund.
[447]
JUDY WOODRUFF: But it sounds like -- I was just going to say, it sounds like you're painting
[450]
a picture of a healthy set of transactions, whereas, Josh Kosman, you're painting something
[457]
very different.
[458]
What are we -- what am I missing here, Josh Kosman?
[460]
JOSH KOSMAN: I don't think you know, in my view, the facts don't justify what Stewart
[465]
is saying, with all due respect to Stewart.
[468]
What private equity defenders now are doing is throwing out a lot of nice terms, "We build
[474]
businesses," but not a lot of facts behind it.
[477]
Private equity firm returns, according to several good academic studies, are no better
[481]
than the S&P 500.
[483]
And if we look at Bain, which has gotten the most scrutiny lately, four of Bain's 10 biggest
[488]
investments under Mitt Romney ended up going bankrupt, and yet Bain made a lot of money.
[493]
So, I think there's very little evidence that, for the big, large private equity firms, that
[498]
they build any value in their businesses.
[500]
JUDY WOODRUFF: You get the last word, Stewart Kohl, to bring us around to your argument
[505]
on how you see this.
[507]
STEWART KOHL: Yeah, I'm reticent to talk about Bain.
[510]
I'm not an investor in Bain.
[511]
I'm not familiar enough with their results, although I will say that Bain has been able
[516]
to continue to attract capital, which would lead me to believe that most of their transactions
[521]
have worked well enough.
[522]
At Riverside, that has certainly been the case.
[525]
And I'm very proud of the hard work that my colleagues have done to help us build companies
[533]
that have added jobs.
[534]
In the last two years alone, we ve added almost 1,500 jobs.
[539]
That's about a 15 percent increase in the employment of the companies we have invested
[543]
in, in North America.
[544]
And if we looked at the companies that we have invested in, whether it's a Crisis Prevention
[550]
Institute in Milwaukee, or a SmartComp in Washington, Pennsylvania, these are growing,
[557]
profitable companies that are -- have benefited, I think, greatly from private equity.
[563]
And I think if you asked their -- their founders, their managers, people like David and Shannon,
[570]
they would -- they would agree.
[571]
JUDY WOODRUFF: We are going to have to leave it there.
[573]
It's a big subject, and we are going to continue to look at it, no doubt, in the days and weeks
[577]
to come.
[578]
Stewart Kohl, Josh Kosman, we thank you both.
[580]
h?.T h?.T h?.T urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags City urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags
[581]
country-region urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags place JUDY WOODRUFF: Finally tonight, we return
[582]
to an issue raised by the focus on Mitt Romney's taxes, how he made his money as the head of
[583]
a so-called private equity firm Normal Microsoft Office Word n[GJ JUDY WOODRUFF: Finally tonight,
[584]
we return to an issue raised by the focus on Mitt Romney's taxes, how he made his money
[585]
as the head of a so-called private equity firm Title Microsoft Office Word Document
[586]
MSWordDoc Word.Document.8