Sunk Costs - YouTube

Channel: Edspira

[0]
In this video, we're going to discuss the concept of sunk costs.
[4]
A sunk cost is 2 things: (1) it's a cost that has already been incurred, and that means
[12]
that you've already invested the money (you've already spent the money and it is gone).
[18]
(2) It can't be changed going forward.
[22]
You've invested the money.
[23]
You can't go back.
[24]
There's nothing that can be done.
[27]
For these 2 reasons, a sunk cost is irrelevant to decision making.
[38]
Why?
[41]
The money is gone.
[42]
It has already been spent.
[43]
It is already incurred, and we can't change it.
[45]
We can't do anything about it.
[47]
So it shouldn't be affecting our future decisions.
[50]
Let me just walk you through an example, and you'll see in a moment why this is the case.
[57]
Let's say as an example, you pay $10 for a movie ticket.
[65]
The movie that you wanted to see was sold out, so you pay $10 for some other movie that
[72]
you really don't want to see as much.
[74]
When you show up at the movie theatre, somebody offers you a free ticket to a movie that you
[84]
really want to see.
[85]
You would prefer to see this movie that you got the free ticket for.
[91]
Now if you start thinking, "Hey wait a minute, I've already paid $10 for this other movie.
[98]
I should probably see that."
[101]
Well, research has shown that a lot of people will actually go and see the movie that they've
[106]
already paid money for even though they think that they would like it less than the one
[111]
they are being offered a free ticket for.
[113]
And that's because, even though it is a sunk cost in that it has already been incurred
[118]
(we've already paid the $10.
[119]
It's lost.)
[120]
We can't change that.
[122]
People allow this to affect their decision making.
[126]
They have this idea of, "Well, I don't want to be losing money.
[129]
I don't want to waste $10 for nothing."
[133]
So even though they have these 2 options, and they know that they would like option
[138]
2 better than option 1 they will sometimes still choose option 1.
[146]
They are letting this sunk cost that should be irrelevant affect their decision making.
[152]
Now you might say, "Well, this is just going to the movies.
[155]
How is this important to the business world or to real life?"
[159]
Well sometimes what you'll have happen, let's say there's this firm that has invested $100
[165]
million in a project.
[168]
You've got this ongoing project and it looks like this project is not going to be a success.
[175]
There are problems.
[176]
It has just been a nightmare from the beginning, and they should just pull the plug.
[182]
But they are reluctant to pull the plug sometimes because they say, "Well, we've already invested
[188]
$100 million in this.
[190]
We should keep pushing forward."
[193]
Obviously, you don't want to just invest $100 million in something and have one problem
[198]
come up, and you say "Okay let's forget about the money."
[200]
But, if you come to believe that this is not going to be successful (or there's a very
[206]
good likelihood it's not going to be successful) and actually we should deploy our future money
[211]
elsewhere but, you continue along with this other project because you say, "Look, we've
[217]
already invested the $100 million."
[219]
Then what you are doing is you're allowing a sunk cost to affect your decision making,
[225]
and you shouldn't.
[226]
What happened here, to this $100 million dollars...that's gone.
[230]
What you should care about is the future.
[233]
How do we affect the firm positively going forward from here?
[239]
Because this is sunk, we're not getting that money back.
[242]
It's gone.
[243]
And whether we continue to throw money into this project isn't going to change the fact.
[248]
So we have to say, from this point going forward what's the best decision?
[254]
In doing so, we have to ignore sunk costs.
[257]
They are irrelevant, and we shouldn't allow them to affect our decision making going forward.